• 0Shopping Cart
Evalu18
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Golf Near Me
  • Join The Club
  • Log in
  • Golf Courses
    • Golf Course Finder
    • Golf Course Reviews
    • Collections
  • Golf Course Architecture
    • GCA Book Guide
    • Historical Research
    • GC Architects
  • Shop
  • Journal
    • Random
    • Hole Analysis
    • Harry Colt Project
    • Top 100
    • Books
    • Augusta National
    • Media
    • Equipment
  • Site Index A-Z
  • Menu Menu
Search

Results for {phrase} ({results_count} of {results_count_total})

Displaying {results_count} results of {results_count_total}

View all...

Generic filters

13 Hunstanton

31st July 2020/0 Comments/in Hole Analysis /by

Hole 13 at Hunstanton Golf Club was designed to challenge the best. The 17th and 18th are renowned, but it is the 13th, upon reflection, that makes an impression. The hole is a 387 yard two shotter draped diagonally over a ridgeline. It’s uphill to the precipice then three steps down before a forced carry over dunes to a punchbowl green. Visibility of the green is gained only from perched atop the ridgeline but this leaves you with a longer approach. A shorter approach is at the cost of visibility. Here you cannot have your cake and eat it too. Whether it be the tee shot, the approach or the elements themselves, 13 at Hunstanton delivers.

Tee Shot

The tee shot affords you instinctively 2 options, reach the precipice or blow over it. Not aggressive enough to reach the plateau and your approach shot to the green is completely blind. Too bold and you run off the plateau down the other side and again you face a blind approach to the green. The hole requires you to think, then make a decision, not just the first time you play it but each time.

Tom Simpson wrote there should be “zones from which (the) green can be best approached.” This is a case and point of that design dynamic. Prince Hermann Ludwig Heinrich von Pückler-Muskau said ‘Time is not able to bring forth new truths but only an unfolding of timeless truths.” Great holes stand the test of time and the advancement of technology… at least so far.

Line

The ideal line is to the left side of the fairway to the top of the ridge. A shot of roughly 195 yards. Taking on the fairway bunker and successfully placing your shot will leave the shortest possible approach shot with a full view of the green below. (A) Play away and you incrementally increase the approach to the green with the potential of a longer approach than tee shot. (B) The other option is to try to overpower the hole. However, in doing so you risk hitting the downslope and running through the fairway 260 yards away. With keen conditions and a decent strike and you could easily find your self in trouble. Even if you find the lowest tier, the shot is completely blind albeit shorter. (C)

Hole 13 at Hunstanton

The photo below is taken from position B. Position A is atop the ridge on the left. Position C is below in the collection area of green grass.

13 at Hunstanton

This photo shows the view of the green from the lowest tier, position C.

13 at Hunstanton

Elemental Design Features

  • Natural landforms and interesting features. It is rich in golfing features such as a ridge, dunes and a punchbowl green.
  • Demand for thought and execution. Pick your challenge then deliver.
  • Inability to overpower the hole. An accurately placed shot is rewarded more handsomely than power.
  • Placing shots or accuracy is rewarded, not merely length.
  • Forced carry over the 100 yards is visually intimidating but somewhat easily overcome.
  • The hole gives all a rewarding thrill of overcoming a seemingly daunting challenge.
  • The ability for every class of player to play to their strengths.

Conclusion

The club is proud of its Championship past and is determined to retain that accolade moving forward. Patric Dickinson described the blind approach to a “green like one of those little lost civilizations in some valley encircled by impassable mountains.” This green site and the ground surrounding it along with its superb use of other golfing features’ make this hole one of outstanding architecturally merit. Ability to challenge golfing generations and the onslaught of technology is a hallmark of greatness. One can only wonder how long these holes can resist the momentum of technology and distance. Until now, the battles have been won by the 13th, may we never allow 13 at Hunstanton to lose the war.

Previous
Next
https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Evalu18-5067-2.jpg 573 1500 Jasper https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/evalu18_main-strapline-white-mustard_large.png Jasper2020-07-31 14:57:112021-02-16 12:57:0013 Hunstanton

6 Royal Cinque Ports

15th May 2020/0 Comments/in Hole Analysis /by

To borrow an overused analogy, the first hole at Royal Cinque Ports Golf Club is a warm handshake. With the second, you feel a tightening of the grip. By the third, you’re losing feeling in your hand and you’ve locked eyes with your amenable adversary. By the fifth, the fight is on and it’s got the point one of you needs to give. The crescendo is the all or nothing, risk-reward par 4 6th. Hole 6 Royal Cinque Ports gives you the option to: Firstly, make a statement. Secondly, respectfully loosen the grip de-escalating the stakes. Thirdly, honourably capitulate whilst maintaining your dignity.

At First Glance

What is clear immediately from the tee is there are at least two options. Go for the green or lay up. Choosing a direct line to the green, successfully played it can yield an eagle, likely a birdie and at worst a par. Statement made.  The second option is to lay up and play this as a two-shot hole. Walk off with four and everybody’s pride is left intact despite both parties each knowing there was a little left on the table. It is the age-old, time-tested, risk and reward par 4. However, it isn’t quite that straightforward… and that’s what makes this hole great.

The green on the short the short 6th Royal Cinque Ports.

©Jason Livy

Upon Deeper Review

After playing the hole the first time you realise there are, in fact, three available options each with layers of character:

The 6th Royal Cinque Ports Golf Club.

©Google Maps Evalu18

Option A: Go for the green. An all-or-nothing approach that is not quite that straightforward. Fail the carry and you find yourself, not in a hazard, but playing from the dunes! Spray it wide right and over the sea wall, you find yourself on the beach rather than out of bounds. In either circumstance, a penalty drop or a stroke and distance penalty may have been the preferred option. If you’re going to make a statement, make sure you can pull it off…

The rear of the 6th Royal Cinque Ports

Location A ©Jason Livy

Option B: Hit your tee shot as close as possible to the apex of the dogleg. Seems like the logical thing to do, right? While you have a better look at the green you probably will see only the top of the flag. While you may be nearer the green, the requisite shot will be awkward and decisions will need to be made. The closer you get to the green, the more undulating the terrain. Driving as close as you can to the generous landing area could leave you a short pitch from a decent lie to an awkward half shot from a precarious lie. You’d be surprised how many members putt from here…

Location B on 6th Royal Cinque Ports.

Location B ©Jason Livy

Option C: The shortest tee shot to the level plateau 40 yards long and 25 yards wide beside the left side fairway bunker. This leaves you a level lie but also a semi-blind approach to an elevated green. The closer you go towards the bunker the more the green opens up to you. At first glance, this is the cop-out. However, it requires two very good shots to carry the day, as opposed to one of the highest order.

Location C on the 6th.

Location C ©Jason Livy

In Summary

What makes this hole so good?

All or nothing this is not. Many drivable par 4’s begin or end with one shot. Success or failure depends on the ability to pull off a single shot. Whiff and you can have another go. The bleeding stops and you can redeem yourself. Here, go for it and miss… it’s the beginning of a very long, short par 4. It is the gift that keeps on giving.

You cannot have it all. With many strategic golf holes, taking on the risk and pulling it off gets you all of the reward. Not here. Option B gets you closer but you’re almost guaranteed a somewhat dodgy lie. Option C gets you a level lie and a full shot in but it’s semi-blind. Even if you are successful in your first attempt, there is no let-up until you’ve tapped in on the green.

The fairway mouth on the par 4 6th.

©Jason Livy

Conclusion

Hole 6 Royal Cinque Ports is one of many with strategic brilliance. There are layers of intrigue and little nuances that lift this short par 4 from good to great. When you play golf next, look for holes that offer variety as well as risk and reward. Beyond that, looking for holes gives you more options as you play them as opposed to less. Lastly, it’s my opinion a well-designed hole should be a little unfair and not give everything away all in one go. The best holes allow you to attempt to gain an advantage but still have some bother left for you to contend with. The 6th Royal Cinque Ports has all this and more. A great golfing hole with depth and character.

Take a flyover of Hole 6 at Royal Cinque Ports.

Photos by Jason Livy

Previous
Next
https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/E18_RCP_606th-Hole-Royal-Cinque-Ports-Golf-Club-01.jpg 1222 2000 Jasper https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/evalu18_main-strapline-white-mustard_large.png Jasper2020-05-15 13:01:482022-03-29 08:19:516 Royal Cinque Ports

4 St Enodoc

11th February 2020/in Hole Analysis /by

The brilliance of James Braid is on display Hole 4 St Enodoc with his routing through some of the property’s most exciting topography. After an out and back opening and second hole, you stand on the third tee wondering how on earth you will tumble down the 3rd then wind up on the 4th green just one hole later. The four-hole stretch from 3 through 6 is one of the best in golf.

While the 6th at St Enodoc garners most of the attention with its massive crater-like bunker, but the strategic design of Hole 4 St Enodoc is world-class. In essence, it is the unruly cousin of the Road Hole at The Old Course, St Andrews.

Identifiable Characteristics of Hole 4 St Enodoc

On the fourth tee, variety abounds. There are four conventional approaches which could yield anything from an eagle to par or worse.

Option A: Lay-up 150 yards straight in front of you leaving a 140-yard uphill second. Simple!  Until you factor in the second shot is uphill, usually with the wind, over two bunkers and to a green now oriented perpendicular to yourself affording you the shallowest of targets. Oh and the temptation to go long is muted by the fact O.B. is located only a few feet beyond the green.

Option B: Go for the ledge in front of the green. A 225-yard shot over the corner will set up a relatively easy second shot to a green orientated lengthwise. A narrow opening is all that is to be navigated which gives you an excellent opportunity for birdie. The trade-off? Cut the corner of O.B. and find a landing zone flanked on two sides by O.B. again. There is a genuine risk of hitting three off the tee. If the new 2019 rule is applied, you still have a two-shot penalty, and the relief options resemble the first shot of option A.

Option C: Go for the green. Riveting, but eagles are rare on this all but un-drivable, drivable par 4.

Option D: Play it as a three-shot par four and hope for a one-putt. Lay up short, lay up to the ledge, get it close with your third and hole the putt for par.

This gem is a short par four can be successfully played in four very different ways. While it does yield birdies, a three is not the most common score. In matchplay, it provides the opportunity for both the tiger and rabbit, if they play within their respective games. At first glance, it confounds but the strategy and genius of number 4 is top drawer.

An overlay map of the features of the 4th hole at St Enodoc.

What Makes Hole 4 St Enodoc Special?

Variety, as illustrated above.

Clever use of O.B. in a strategic manner.

Risk vs Reward for every category of player.

Clever use of awkward natural features and man-made limitations to enhance strategy and intrigue.

Further Reading

Tom Doak has written about it in the Confidential Guide, and Clyde Johnson added it to his set of the Fried Egg’s Eclectic 18. St Enodoc by James Braid is a superb course punctuated with incredible highlights such as the fourth.

Previous
Next
https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/E18_4_StEnodoc_Header.jpg 573 1500 Jasper https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/evalu18_main-strapline-white-mustard_large.png Jasper2020-02-11 12:23:332021-02-16 10:03:444 St Enodoc

Hidden Holes Woking Golf Club

5th November 2019/in Hole Analysis /by

Imagine having a world-class course that played a pivotal role in the history of the game. The roots of the modern game and every first-class course earth-wide could trace its design ethos to a single hazard complex, on a single hole. Imagine historical behemoths sketched, wrote and otherwise immortalised your course in the annals of history. However, imagine there is a hole that doesn’t fit, is not regarded as a sound hole by most, and is held in disdain by the membership.

What are your options? Buy more land, hire a world-class architect and take your chances that the endeavour would be well received and worth the effort and expense. What would you do if you discovered that a legendary architect actually laid out the solution in 1937 and it lay waiting to be rediscovered?

This is precisely where Woking Golf Club finds itself. The membership is not enamoured with the ninth. The fairway canters left to right, around a left to right dogleg to an elevated green. The required tee-ball and approach are not shots most members have at their disposal. Ultimately, there is a distinct lack of strategy at the strategic home of golf.

From 1893 to 1936, the ninth and tenth played as two short par fours. The knock against them? They were similar, played back to back and above all, were blind or semi-blind. Charles Ambrose wrote: “…leaving the 8th green (the golfer) had to retrace his steps to a teeing ground which gave him a semi-blind drive across an old quarry; and if he hit this tee-shot properly, he was left with an iron shot of sorts to a green in a hollow, completely concealed by a ridge.”

The Solution

The solution? In 1937, Tom Simpson made a blind, two-shot par-four ninth into a long par three. The new, elevated tee behind the current eighth green cured the blindness of the former tee shot. The new double-decker green brought forward and built into the ridge that previously caused all the bother on the approach. Three tiers provided two options. There was an opportunity for birdie if significant risks were successfully courted or a safe play to the first tier with two putts for par. 

The conclusion, according to Charles Ambrose? “Altogether, it is difficult to find any fault with the new hole. It is excellent, both in conception and execution.”

The result was the tenth had to change as well. Ambrose wrote: “The old tenth was, admittedly, the weak spot at Woking. For the tee shot, almost any old thing would do so long as the player steered clear of the cluster of bunkers on the right… then followed an iron shot up to a flat plateau green, towering high above the head of the striker, so that he had no idea where the hole was actually cut.”

The new, tenth tee moved behind the old ninth green. A single hazard was introduced into the middle of the fairway 230 yards from the tee. There was a 30-yard wide strip of fairway to the left from which the green was orientated to accept a 200-yard shot. The new green site moved left on the precipice of the hillside. There was a bunker to the high side and low side of the green which both came into play if you approached the green from the left of the centreline bunker. A pond was located below the green which collected anything left short or left. 

The Critics Response

What was the conclusion of the new tenth? Ambrose summarises “…When all is said and done… this hole may easily become one of the grandest in all of golf.”

In 1959 the two holes were again changed to their current configuration in an attempt to chase down a Par 5. Some felt the course would be more highly regarded with the addition of a three-shot hole. Soon after completing the work, the arbitrary definition of par was changed which reduced the hole from a Par 5 back to a Par 4. Instead of reverting to Simpon’s design, the club stayed the course.

From 1893 until 1937, the tenth was the weakest hole on the course. Between, 1937 to 1959, Simpson seems to have resolved the problem by creating two great holes from two indifferent. Since 1959, after alterations and with hindsight, the ninth is again regarded as the weak spot. A curious history of the Hidden Holes Woking Golf Club. 

The Future

Where do we go from here? The only reasonable solution would seem to be to try the Simpson configuration. Tim Lobb and Andy Ewence are ambitiously improving the course. The reinstatement of Simpson’s 9 & 10 should no doubt be high on the list as it would be popular with the membership and a marketers’ dream. Will it soon be possible to play Simpson’s newest holes, 70 years after they were lost? We hope so! The world of golf is owed it. One can only hope the Hidden Holes Woking Golf Club aren’t hidden for much longer. 

We wish to thank Lee Patterson for his contributions to this article.

The Hidden Holes Woking Golf Club froom Tom Simpson.

©Google Maps Evalu18

Previous
Next
https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Evalu18_Clubhouse-Woking-Golf-Club-1015-Edit.jpg 1222 2000 Jasper https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/evalu18_main-strapline-white-mustard_large.png Jasper2019-11-05 00:01:112021-02-17 16:01:28Hidden Holes Woking Golf Club

4 Woking Golf Club

4th November 2019/in Hole Analysis /by

John Low’s and Stuart Paton’s addition to the centre of a single fairway on 4 Woking Golf Club helped shaped golf into what it is today. The resulting impact on inland golf, strategic golf design and the career of Tom Simpson make them possibly the most significant man-made hazards in golf. Their significance cannot be understated. However, the rest of the hole is also intriguing.

Background

Well known is that the motive for Low and Paton introducing a centreline hazard was the Principals Nose on the sixteenth at St Andrews. Without being pedantic, this bunker at the Old Course is not a single bunker. Instead, it is a complex of three. The centreline hazard on the fourth at Woking is not a single bunker. It is a complementary pair of bunkers.

Two well-known illustrations are well-regarded references — the Tom Simpson sketch from The Architectural Side of Golf and Bernard Darwin’s Jovial Golfer cigarette card. Of note, the Simpson sketch gives not only a description but scale and distance in yards. These provide us with a reference point for further analysis.

What Has Stayed the Same

What can we say with confidence? Firstly, the railway which runs parallel to the hole hasn’t changed location. Using this a general reference and Simpson’s measurements, we can also conclude the site of the centreline bunker complex hasn’t migrated. As well, the location of the front left green-side bunker is as per Simpson’s sketch. The opening is still roughly 20 yards.

What Has Changed

At some point, a further bunker was introduced on the left side of the fairway. The trees on the left were planted or propagated, and an access road for the greenkeepers added. Additional tee’s to lengthen the hole also appeared.

What Has Disappeared

Width and along with it, heather. The left side of the fairway extended at parts beyond even the path that meanders through the trees. Simpson defines 35 yards of fairway left of the hazard before finding the short heather. Additionally, the second bunker on the left-hand side of the green is now gone. The green extended beyond the front bunker and bisected the lost, left-side bunker. The right green-side bunker which ran the length of the green has also been lost. Simpson notes a significant left to right tilt to the green itself as a notable design feature. This tilt appears to be conveyed in Simpsons sketch, especially on the right and to the rear. It also seems to show heather-clad hillocks at the back of the green complex.

The Simpson sketch also appears to suggest the teeing area was in line with the Low and Paton centreline hazard and the bunker on the front of the green. This orientation would create an even more exciting tee shot. Anyone looking for the right-hand alley would need to play toward O.B.

Will There Be a Restoration?

Plans are afoot for further restorative work. Only time will tell which features will be restored. It seems inevitable heather and width will see a return. Will the additional left fairway bunker be removed? Could the lost green-side bunkers be reintroduced? Will the green be increased to its original size? Will shaping and heather return behind the green? We wait with baited breath to see what happens on 4 Woking Golf Club.

Woking has a significant history of design works. The fourth as shown has changed despite the reverence it deservedly garners. The eighth and ninth have a turbulent history. A second sixteenth was recently created, and the original made into a turf nursery. Woking has proved itself to be resilient despite change and improves continually.

So then, what is the plan moving forward? Tim Lobb, Andy Ewence, Richard Pennell and an educated membership at Woking are embarking on significant changes. Course works are underway. In the winter of 2018/19, areas around the second green, eighth green and eleventh tee were opened up, heather restored throughout, and the sixth received a significant cosmetic facelift. Irrigation course-wide will be updated and introduced during the winter of 2019/20. We eagerly await the improvements to see what Woking will bring us next.

Tom Simpson's sketch over a modern map at 4 Woking Golf Club.

© Google Maps Evalu18

Previous
Next
https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Evalu18_04th-Hole-Woking-Golf-Club-2010-Edit.jpg 1333 2000 Jasper https://evalu18.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/evalu18_main-strapline-white-mustard_large.png Jasper2019-11-04 12:03:592021-02-16 13:01:514 Woking Golf Club

Pages

  • About
  • Basket
  • Books
  • Checkout
  • Collections
  • Equipment
  • Golf Architecture Books
  • Golf Course Architects
  • Golf Course Finder
  • Golf Course Reviews
  • Harry Colt Project
  • Hole Analysis
  • Home
  • Journal
  • Media
  • Modern Golf Art & Photography
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Random
  • Services
  • Site Index A-Z
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Test Page
  • The Masters & Augusta National
  • The Old Course Quiz
  • Top 100
  • Website Terms of Use/Service

Categories

  • Books
  • Equipment
  • Harry Colt
  • Hole Analysis
  • Media
  • Quiz
  • Random
  • The Masters & Augusta National
  • Top100
  • Travel

Archive

  • June 2022
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • November 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • August 2019

About Evalu18

  • About Evalu18
  • Where is My Course?
  • Who We Support
  • Why Join the Club?
  • Contact Us
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Top Collections

  • Best English Golf Collection
  • Best Irish Golf Collection
  • Best Scottish Golf Collection
  • GOLF Top 100

Top Courses

  • St Andrews Links – Old Course
  • Royal St George’s Golf Club
  • Lahinch Golf Club
  • Woking Golf Club
  • Muirfield
  • Minchinhampton Golf Club

© 2022 - Evalu18 Ltd. Get in touch: Fore@Evalu18.com
  • Privacy Policy
Privacy settings
Scroll to top
  • Sign in
  • New account

Prove your Humanity: + =

Forgot your password?

Prove your Humanity: − =

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive mail with link to set new password.

Prove your Humanity: − =

Back to login